Fourth VC contract - maybe not
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:26 pm
Well I've done some research and updated some stuff.
First, thanks to Fred Coldwell for the better image of the VC listing.
http://www.gwim2.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/odatv.pdf
This has given us some changes to numbers and I've updated the VC List accordingly;
http://www.gwim2.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/vclist.htm
Second, it appears that Ernie was right, in that the 398-QM-8039 contract that mentions VC2 and VC3 on the listing, but with T207 engines, is in fact a T207 series contract starting at chassis 8,644,701 ( about sixty chassis higher than the last known T202 VC. I dug out my copy of an early T207 Parts List from September 1940 to verify this;
It is still possible there was some crossover, but for me that starting chassis number strongly suggests these were T-207 trucks
First, thanks to Fred Coldwell for the better image of the VC listing.
http://www.gwim2.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/odatv.pdf
This has given us some changes to numbers and I've updated the VC List accordingly;
http://www.gwim2.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/vclist.htm
Second, it appears that Ernie was right, in that the 398-QM-8039 contract that mentions VC2 and VC3 on the listing, but with T207 engines, is in fact a T207 series contract starting at chassis 8,644,701 ( about sixty chassis higher than the last known T202 VC. I dug out my copy of an early T207 Parts List from September 1940 to verify this;
It is still possible there was some crossover, but for me that starting chassis number strongly suggests these were T-207 trucks